TY - JOUR
T1 - MRI Features for Differentiation of Meningioma DNA Methylation Groups
AU - Yu, Theresa J
AU - Luks, Tracy
AU - Calabrese, Evan
AU - Choudhury, Abrar
AU - Chen, William C
AU - McDermott, Michael W
AU - Magill, Stephen T
AU - Raleigh, David R
AU - Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E
N1 - © 2026 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
PY - 2026/5/7
Y1 - 2026/5/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: DNA methylation profiling is a predictor of meningioma behavior and outcomes. We aimed to identify qualitative and quantitative MRI features to distinguish between three meningioma methylation groups: Merlin-intact, Immune-enriched, and Hypermitotic, each with distinct clinical outcomes, biologic features, and therapeutic vulnerabilities.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MRIs were retrospectively analyzed in meningiomas with previous DNA methylation profiling. Pearson's Chi-square, Fisher exact, and ANOVA tests were used to compare features between the three groups. ROC AUCs were used to assess the accuracy in discriminating between groups.RESULTS: 165 patients (54 years ± 14 SD; 58 men) were analyzed. 60 meningiomas were Merlin-intact, 55 Immune-enriched, and 50 Hypermitotic. Qualitative reduced diffusion (
p< .001), nADC (
p< .001), T2WI signal intensity (
p= .02), T1 CE volume (
p<.005), and tumor site (
p<.001) varied between the groups. Merlin-intact meningiomas had higher T2WI signal intensity than Immune-enriched tumors (1.97 ± 0.98 vs 1.63 ± 0.45,
p= .04). Hypermitotic meningiomas had the highest proportion of tumors with qualitative reduced diffusion (67%) and lowest nADC values (1.07 ± 0.14) compared to Merlin-intact (18%,
p< .001; 1.41 ± 0.30,
p< .001) and Immune-enriched (31%,
p= .02; 1.29 ± 0.29,
p= .002) meningiomas. The presence of qualitative reduced diffusion (AUC 0.71,
p= .001) and lower nADC (AUC 0.82,
p< .001) were able to predict Hypermitotic meningiomas. Merlin-intact tumors were predicted by the absence of qualitative reduced diffusion (AUC 0.66,
p= 0.01), higher nADC (AUC 0.74,
p< .001), and higher T2WI signal intensity (AUC 0.64,
p= .047). Hypermitotic tumors (64.3 cm
3 ± 49.1) had larger T1CE volumes than Merlin-intact (42.5 cm
3 ± 37.9,
p= .02) and Immune-enriched (38.2 cm
3 ± 37.7,
p=<.002) tumors, with tumor size a predictor of Hypermitotic (AUC 0.65,
p=.003) and Immune-enriched (AUC 0.62,
p=.02) meningiomas. Merlin-intact tumors were predicted by presence at the skull base (AUC 0.67,
p<.001) while Immune-enriched tumors were predicted by location outside of the skull base (AUC 0.61; 95% CI 0.70, 0.52,
p= .02).
CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging has the potential to discriminate between different molecular groups of meningioma and to serve as a surrogate non-invasive marker of tumor behavior.
AB - BACKGROUND: DNA methylation profiling is a predictor of meningioma behavior and outcomes. We aimed to identify qualitative and quantitative MRI features to distinguish between three meningioma methylation groups: Merlin-intact, Immune-enriched, and Hypermitotic, each with distinct clinical outcomes, biologic features, and therapeutic vulnerabilities.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MRIs were retrospectively analyzed in meningiomas with previous DNA methylation profiling. Pearson's Chi-square, Fisher exact, and ANOVA tests were used to compare features between the three groups. ROC AUCs were used to assess the accuracy in discriminating between groups.RESULTS: 165 patients (54 years ± 14 SD; 58 men) were analyzed. 60 meningiomas were Merlin-intact, 55 Immune-enriched, and 50 Hypermitotic. Qualitative reduced diffusion (
p< .001), nADC (
p< .001), T2WI signal intensity (
p= .02), T1 CE volume (
p<.005), and tumor site (
p<.001) varied between the groups. Merlin-intact meningiomas had higher T2WI signal intensity than Immune-enriched tumors (1.97 ± 0.98 vs 1.63 ± 0.45,
p= .04). Hypermitotic meningiomas had the highest proportion of tumors with qualitative reduced diffusion (67%) and lowest nADC values (1.07 ± 0.14) compared to Merlin-intact (18%,
p< .001; 1.41 ± 0.30,
p< .001) and Immune-enriched (31%,
p= .02; 1.29 ± 0.29,
p= .002) meningiomas. The presence of qualitative reduced diffusion (AUC 0.71,
p= .001) and lower nADC (AUC 0.82,
p< .001) were able to predict Hypermitotic meningiomas. Merlin-intact tumors were predicted by the absence of qualitative reduced diffusion (AUC 0.66,
p= 0.01), higher nADC (AUC 0.74,
p< .001), and higher T2WI signal intensity (AUC 0.64,
p= .047). Hypermitotic tumors (64.3 cm
3 ± 49.1) had larger T1CE volumes than Merlin-intact (42.5 cm
3 ± 37.9,
p= .02) and Immune-enriched (38.2 cm
3 ± 37.7,
p=<.002) tumors, with tumor size a predictor of Hypermitotic (AUC 0.65,
p=.003) and Immune-enriched (AUC 0.62,
p=.02) meningiomas. Merlin-intact tumors were predicted by presence at the skull base (AUC 0.67,
p<.001) while Immune-enriched tumors were predicted by location outside of the skull base (AUC 0.61; 95% CI 0.70, 0.52,
p= .02).
CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging has the potential to discriminate between different molecular groups of meningioma and to serve as a surrogate non-invasive marker of tumor behavior.
U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A9396
DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A9396
M3 - Article
C2 - 42097851
SN - 0195-6108
JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology
JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology
ER -