Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?

Julie A. Sosa; Pritesh Mehta; Daniel C. Thomas; Gretchen Berland; Cary Gross; Robert L. Mcnamara; Ronnie Rosenthal; Robert Udelsman; Dawn M. Bravata; Sanziana A. Roman

doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad8905

Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?

Julie A. Sosa, Pritesh Mehta, Daniel C. Thomas, Gretchen Berland, Cary Gross, Robert L. Mcnamara, Ronnie Rosenthal, Robert Udelsman, Dawn M. Bravata, Sanziana A. Roman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Annals of Surgery
Volume	250
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad8905
State	Published - Jan 7 2009
Externally published	Yes

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences
Surgery

Access to Document

10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad8905License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{fe1d18c6cc1545a2b090e1824e0fd3d8,

title = "Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?",

author = "Sosa, \{Julie A.\} and Pritesh Mehta and Thomas, \{Daniel C.\} and Gretchen Berland and Cary Gross and Mcnamara, \{Robert L.\} and Ronnie Rosenthal and Robert Udelsman and Bravata, \{Dawn M.\} and Roman, \{Sanziana A.\}",

note = "Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):152-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad8905.",

year = "2009",

month = jan,

day = "7",

doi = "10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad8905",

language = "American English",