Efficacy of Antiseptic Mouthrinses Against SARS-CoV-2: A Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.

Objectives:  Coronavirus-disease-19 (COVID-19) continues to affect millions of individuals worldwide. Antiviral activity of mouthrinses remains an important research area as the oral cavity is a site of SARS-CoV-2 initial replication. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of three different mouthrinses in reducing the oral/oropharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 viral load.

Methods:  Adult patients, hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 were recruited for the study. Oral/oropharyngeal baseline SARS-CoV-2 samples were collected and analyzed by Real-Time-PCR. Subsequently, patients were instructed to rinse with 1 % hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), 0.12 % chlorhexidine (CHX), 1 % povidone‑iodine (PVP-I) or Sodium Chloride 0.9 % (placebo). Viral loads were measured right after (T1), and at 45 min (T2) from the rinse.

Results:  In the PVP-I 1 % group, 5/8 (62.5 %) patients at T1, and 3/8 (37.5 %) patients at T2, SARS-CoV-2 was not detectable in the swab specimens. In the H 2 O 2  1 % group, 2/11 (18.2 %) patients at T1, and 2/11 (18.2 %) other patients at T2 showed no SARS-CoV-2 loads. One (12.5 %) patient in the CHX 0.12 % group showed SARS-CoV-2 negativity at T2. One (9.1 %) patient at T1, and another (9.1 %) patient at T2 showed no SARS-CoV-2 loads in the placebo group.

Conclusions:  Oral SARS-CoV-2 loads were reduced at T1 in the PVP-I 1 % and H 2 O 2  1 % groups.

Clinical relevance:  PVP-I 1 % was the most effective rinse especially in patients with low viral copy numbers at baseline.

Keywords:  COVID-19; Chlorhexidine; Disinfection; Mouth; Oral cavity; Oral diseases; Oral medicine; Oral rinses; Povidone‑iodine; Public health; Saliva.