Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CNSide™ versus standard cytology for leptomeningeal disease

Haley R Appel, Muni Rubens, Mukesh Roy, Rupesh Kotecha, Matthew D Hall, Minesh P Mehta, Alexander Mohler, Zhijian Chen, Manmeet S Ahluwalia, Yazmin Odia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compares the real-world performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CNSide™ versus cytology in leptomeningeal disease (LMD).

METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected LMD who underwent lumbar punctures for CSF cytology and CNSide™ from January 2020 to December 2022 were reviewed. LMD was classified by EANO criteria. Descriptive statistics, confusion matrix, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional regression were used.

RESULTS: Median age for 87 evaluable patients was 63 years (range: 23-93); 82 (94%) met EANO criteria for possible/probable/confirmed LMD (EANO/LMD). The commonest primary cancers were breast (36,44.0%) and lung (34,41.5%). Primary lung harbored actionable mutations in 18 (53.0%); primary breast expressed hormone receptors in 27 (75%), and HER2 amplification in 8 (22%). Uncontrolled systemic disease was detected in 35 (40%), while 25 (46%) received systemic therapy with medium/high CNS penetrance at LMD diagnosis. The median time from initial cancer to LMD diagnosis was 31 months (range: 13-73). LMD was confirmed by CSF cytology in 23/82 (28%), all identified by CNSide™. CNSide™ identified 13 additional cases (36/82, 43.9%), increasing diagnostic yield by 56.5%. Median overall survival (mOS) was 31 weeks (95%CI: 21-43), significantly worse for CNSide™ positive versus negative: 4.0 versus 16.0 weeks, respectively (HR = 0.50, P  = .010). While survival since LMD diagnosis did not differ by histology, time to LMD diagnosis from initial cancer diagnosis was longer for breast (48.5 months, IQR: 30.0-87.5) versus lung (8 months, IQR:0.5-16.0) cohorts. mOS was longer for patients eligible for intrathecal chemotherapy (HR: 0.189, 95%CI: 0.053-0.672, P  = .010).

CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective, real-world analysis of CNSide™ showed increased sensitivity versus cytology and provided clinically relevant molecular CSF analyses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)vdae071
JournalNeuro-oncology advances
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Cite this